Presage HRV Model Card


THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, AND PRESAGE'S SDK AND APP, ARE OFFERED FOR GENERAL WELLNESS AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NEITHER HAVE BEEN CLEARED BY THE FDA AND NEITHER MAY BE USED FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.

1. Model Details

Basic info: Presage vitals by video analysis generates heart rate variability metrics (RMSSD, SDNN, Baevsky Stress Index) from a video of a subject. Output frequency: one measurement per 60 seconds.

Organization: Presage Technologies

Model date: 2026-08-06

Model version: dc437d54

Model type: A proprietary computer vision and signal processing pipeline extracts a photoplethysmogram (PPG) from video of a subject, from which NN intervals are derived. HRV metrics reported: RMSSD = sqrt(mean((NNi+1 - NNi)2)), the root mean square of successive NN differences (ms); SDNN = sqrt(mean((NNi - mean(NN))2)), the standard deviation of NN intervals (ms); and Baevsky Stress Index = AMo / (2 × Mo × MxDMn), a measure of autonomic balance derived from the NN interval distribution.

License: The algorithm is currently proprietary, and licenses are granted with predefined agreement.

Contact: Questions can be sent to: support@presagetech.com


2. Intended Use

Model Uses

This HRV model was intended for use in analysis and non-diagnostic utility of HRV. It requires at least 60 consecutive seconds of unobstructed facial view acquired at 25+ fps. Only intended for participants with pulse rate 40-180 BPM.

Out-of-Scope Uses

As noted above. Not intended for diagnostic purposes, arrhythmia detection, or monitoring. Not intended for highly dynamic environments.


3. Validation

Reference Standard: Biopac MP160 3-lead ECG. R-peaks detected from ECG; NN intervals computed; HRV metrics derived from NN intervals over matched 60-second windows.

Comparison Methodology: HRV (RMSSD, SDNN, Baevsky) measurements from the camera-based system were compared against time-aligned reference measurements. Ground truth signals were checked for quality using labeled signal annotations; segments with poor signal quality were excluded from analysis.


4. Data Demographics

Category Distribution
Total 118 subjects, 418 videos
Camera (videos) e-con See3CAM CU27: 114, Logitech C920: 113, Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod): 101, Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld): 90
Sex (subjects) Female: 63, Male: 55
Age Group (subjects) 18-25: 34, 26-35: 39, 36-45: 17, 46-55: 15, 56-65: 10, 65+: 2
Fitzpatrick (subjects) Type 1: 21, Type 2: 12, Type 3: 13, Type 4: 24, Type 5: 33, Type 6: 15
BMI (subjects) Mean: 27.9, Range: 16.5–54.3, N=118
Lighting (videos) Ring Light: 133, Lamp: 132, Window: 99

Reference standard: Biopac 3-lead ECG. Confidence values averaged across each 60-second period.


5. Data Provenance

Reference Instrumentation: Biopac research-grade physiological sensors: ECG (for HRV ground truth).

Camera Devices Tested: Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod), Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld), e-con See3CAM CU27 (USB), Logitech C920 (tripod).

Average Camera Distance: Samsung S24/e-con/Logitech: 26", Samsung S24 handheld: 10"

Data Handling: All subject data is de-identified. Derived metrics and anonymized identifiers are retained. Data is securely stored with access restricted to trained researchers.


6. Factors

The HRV model requires face detection for photoplethysmographic signal extraction.


These factors can affect model performance:


Lighting Conditions Tested:


Other factors:


7. Metrics

(at 80% Return Rate, Confidence >= 79)

  1. Mean NN MAE: 3.12 ms
  2. Mean NN RMSE: 4.41 ms
  3. RMSSD MAE: 10.19 ms
  4. RMSSD RMSE: 13.74 ms
  5. SDNN MAE: 5.35 ms
  6. SDNN RMSE: 7.72 ms

8. Quantitative Analysis

Computed vs Ground Truth at Confidence Thresholds

Bland-Altman Plot

Confidence Lookup Table

Confidence >= Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms) Return Rate (%) N (samples)
0 4.49 8.71 14.33 21.32 8.23 14.13 100.0 8067
10 4.49 8.71 14.33 21.32 8.23 14.13 100.0 8067
20 3.54 5.31 12.29 17.07 6.87 10.95 95.7 7720
30 3.52 5.29 12.05 16.74 6.71 10.77 94.6 7633
40 3.44 5.15 11.79 16.22 6.52 10.27 93.6 7551
50 3.36 5.00 11.33 15.46 6.17 9.41 91.4 7376
60 3.25 4.80 10.61 14.22 5.67 8.25 87.6 7063
65 3.22 4.76 10.44 14.04 5.57 8.14 85.4 6889
70 3.21 4.73 10.39 14.00 5.54 8.11 83.5 6733
75 3.14 4.48 10.37 13.99 5.46 7.92 81.7 6592
79 3.12 4.41 10.19 13.74 5.35 7.72 80.0 6432
80 3.10 4.38 10.16 13.68 5.33 7.68 79.3 6401
85 3.00 4.22 9.75 12.96 5.06 7.07 76.1 6140
90 2.91 4.08 9.59 12.66 4.91 6.80 70.1 5654
95 2.89 4.05 8.96 11.89 4.54 6.25 62.1 5007
96 2.87 4.04 8.72 11.56 4.45 6.16 59.7 4813
97 2.81 3.93 8.62 11.54 4.33 5.88 55.9 4506
98 2.83 3.98 8.33 11.32 4.14 5.70 50.7 4089
99 2.91 4.09 7.79 10.95 3.89 5.46 41.2 3326

Performance

(at 80% Return Rate, Confidence >= 79)

By Camera Type

Camera Type N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod) 1974 89.0 3.41 4.92 10.57 14.47 5.98 8.85
Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld) 426 49.2 2.96 4.08 10.34 12.42 5.16 8.07
e-con See3CAM CU27 1886 76.3 3.10 4.27 9.67 13.45 5.27 7.56
Logitech C920 2146 85.4 2.89 4.10 10.28 13.55 4.88 6.59

By Fitzpatrick Skin Type

Fitzpatrick N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Type I 1269 95.6 3.67 5.27 8.34 10.78 3.37 4.34
Type II 878 94.9 2.44 3.14 6.87 9.01 4.13 5.50
Type III 940 92.3 4.11 5.32 8.09 10.66 4.94 7.77
Type IV 1439 86.3 2.95 4.30 9.68 12.68 5.27 6.69
Type V 1557 68.3 2.63 3.65 13.01 16.46 6.82 9.33
Type VI 349 41.0 3.00 4.59 20.52 25.99 10.53 14.77
Fitzpatrick Type VI: Breakdown by Lighting Condition
Ring Light 165 57.7 2.18 2.90 18.95 19.94 8.24 9.57
Window 17 6.3 6.24 7.11 25.10 27.55 6.70 7.08
Lamp 129 50.2 3.77 6.06 24.76 34.31 14.95 21.18

Note: Types I-V are composites across all lighting conditions (Ring Light, Window, Lamp).

By Sex

Sex N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Male 3309 83.7 3.32 4.75 8.53 11.23 4.68 6.41
Female 3123 75.9 2.91 4.03 11.96 15.97 6.06 8.90

By Age Group

Age Group N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
18-25 2036 85.3 4.12 5.50 8.97 12.53 5.31 7.96
26-35 1954 76.0 2.96 3.84 7.57 11.34 4.10 6.91
36-45 862 75.0 2.69 3.68 13.34 15.73 5.86 7.51
46-55 935 85.5 1.78 2.49 14.16 15.91 7.16 8.55
56-65 571 84.1 2.64 4.80 9.86 13.01 4.78 5.75
65+ 14 11.8 6.13 7.19 30.32 30.35 7.25 7.57

By Lighting Type

Lighting N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Lamp 2072 80.5 3.39 4.92 9.58 13.74 5.26 8.50
Ring Light 2261 83.7 2.89 3.89 11.17 14.73 5.51 7.71
Window 1228 66.6 3.50 5.01 8.92 11.35 4.80 6.02

9. Fairness & Equity

Bias Assessment Methodology: Performance is stratified by Fitzpatrick skin type (I-VI), sex, camera type, and age group. Per-group metrics and Confidence averages are reported in the Quantitative Analysis tables above.


10. Ethical Considerations

As a remote sensing device, the risks posed to the subjects in the trial are minimal, including the association of each subject with corresponding biometric data. Mitigation of these risks include de-identifying all subject data, including videos, prior to saving it. Additionally, all data is securely stored with access to a select number of trained researchers.

The model is not intended for human life-critical decisions, diagnostics or prognostication.

11. Limitations and Tradeoffs