Presage HRV Model Card


THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, AND PRESAGE'S SDK AND APP, ARE OFFERED FOR GENERAL WELLNESS AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NEITHER HAVE BEEN CLEARED BY THE FDA AND NEITHER MAY BE USED FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.

1. Model Details

Basic info: Presage vitals by video analysis generates heart rate variability metrics (RMSSD, SDNN, Baevsky Stress Index) from a video of a subject. Output frequency: one measurement per 60 seconds.

Organization: Presage Technologies

Model date: 2026-04-01

Model version: 3.0.0-rc.11

Model type: A proprietary computer vision and signal processing pipeline extracts a photoplethysmogram (PPG) from video of a subject, from which NN intervals are derived. HRV metrics reported: RMSSD = sqrt(mean((NNi+1 - NNi)2)), the root mean square of successive NN differences (ms); SDNN = sqrt(mean((NNi - mean(NN))2)), the standard deviation of NN intervals (ms); and Baevsky Stress Index = AMo / (2 × Mo × MxDMn), a measure of autonomic balance derived from the NN interval distribution.

License: The algorithm is currently proprietary, and licenses are granted with predefined agreement.

Contact: Questions can be sent to: support@presagetech.com


2. Intended Use

Model Uses

This HRV model was intended for use in analysis and non-diagnostic utility of HRV. It requires at least 60 consecutive seconds of unobstructed facial view acquired at 25+ fps. Only intended for participants with pulse rate 40-180 BPM.

Out-of-Scope Uses

As noted above. Not intended for diagnostic purposes, arrhythmia detection, or monitoring. Not intended for highly dynamic environments.


3. Validation

Reference Standard: Biopac MP160 3-lead ECG. R-peaks detected from ECG; NN intervals computed; HRV metrics derived from NN intervals over matched 60-second windows.

Comparison Methodology: HRV (RMSSD, SDNN, Baevsky) measurements from the camera-based system were compared against time-aligned reference measurements. Ground truth signals were checked for quality using labeled signal annotations; segments with poor signal quality were excluded from analysis.


4. Data Demographics

Category Distribution
Total 119 subjects, 431 videos
Camera (videos) Logitech C920: 118, e-con See3CAM CU27: 115, Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod): 101, Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld): 97
Sex (subjects) Female: 63, Male: 56
Age Group (subjects) 18-25: 38, 26-35: 35, 36-45: 18, 46-55: 15, 56-65: 10, 65+: 2
Fitzpatrick (subjects) Type 1: 21, Type 2: 13, Type 3: 13, Type 4: 24, Type 5: 33, Type 6: 15
BMI (subjects) Mean: 27.9, Range: 16.5–54.3, N=119
Lighting (videos) Lamp: 137, Ring Light: 133, Window: 105

Reference standard: Biopac 3-lead ECG. Confidence values averaged across each 60-second period.


5. Data Provenance

Reference Instrumentation: Biopac research-grade physiological sensors: ECG (for HRV ground truth).

Camera Devices Tested: Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod), Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld), e-con See3CAM CU27 (USB), Logitech C920 (tripod).

Average Camera Distance: Samsung S24/e-con/Logitech: 26", Samsung S24 handheld: 10"

Data Handling: All subject data is de-identified. Derived metrics and anonymized identifiers are retained. Data is securely stored with access restricted to trained researchers.


6. Factors

The HRV model requires face detection for photoplethysmographic signal extraction.


These factors can affect model performance:


Lighting Conditions Tested:


Other factors:


7. Metrics

(at 80% Return Rate, Confidence >= 89)

  1. Mean NN MAE: 3.40 ms
  2. Mean NN RMSE: 5.06 ms
  3. RMSSD MAE: 13.11 ms
  4. RMSSD RMSE: 17.66 ms
  5. SDNN MAE: 6.87 ms
  6. SDNN RMSE: 10.42 ms

8. Quantitative Analysis

Computed vs Ground Truth at Confidence Thresholds

Bland-Altman Plot

Confidence Lookup Table

Confidence >= Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms) Return Rate (%) N (samples)
0 9.15 21.96 26.57 45.67 16.54 32.21 100.0 17452
10 9.15 21.96 26.57 45.67 16.54 32.21 100.0 17452
20 7.22 15.97 23.02 37.72 13.87 26.09 97.8 17060
30 6.43 13.41 21.74 34.74 12.88 23.69 96.8 16897
40 5.82 11.81 20.16 31.33 11.76 21.02 95.4 16641
50 4.66 7.88 18.09 26.72 10.18 17.12 93.1 16244
60 4.33 7.00 17.15 24.68 9.55 15.61 92.1 16079
65 4.09 6.35 16.43 23.38 8.99 14.26 90.9 15860
70 3.98 5.94 15.85 21.97 8.55 13.13 89.7 15653
75 3.88 5.84 15.39 21.33 8.30 12.84 87.9 15335
80 3.76 5.67 14.83 20.21 8.01 12.38 86.1 15020
85 3.54 5.34 13.79 18.65 7.42 11.41 82.5 14394
89 3.40 5.06 13.11 17.66 6.87 10.42 80.0 13920
90 3.39 5.02 12.96 17.38 6.76 10.23 79.1 13796
95 3.04 4.18 11.54 15.13 5.81 8.23 70.3 12271

Performance

(at 80% Return Rate, Confidence >= 89)

By Camera Type

Camera Type N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Samsung S24 Rear 24mm (tripod) 3934 90.4 3.59 5.47 11.93 15.89 6.27 8.52
Samsung S24 Front 27mm (handheld) 1625 56.2 3.05 4.80 14.52 19.52 7.71 12.72
e-con See3CAM CU27 4094 79.8 3.53 4.99 14.00 19.24 7.61 12.00
Logitech C920 4267 84.1 3.36 4.93 12.37 16.16 6.14 8.42

By Fitzpatrick Skin Type

Fitzpatrick N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Type I 2472 94.9 2.94 3.90 8.18 10.66 3.53 4.49
Type II 1748 90.1 2.57 4.35 9.19 11.18 5.19 8.89
Type III 1724 85.9 4.92 7.79 11.43 17.07 6.65 10.70
Type IV 3300 92.1 3.20 4.66 12.68 17.09 6.79 9.38
Type V 3870 75.2 3.51 4.79 17.55 22.22 9.32 13.43
Type VI 806 37.1 4.00 5.58 19.50 22.87 9.01 11.93
Fitzpatrick Type VI: Breakdown by Lighting Condition
Ring Light 337 46.7 4.59 5.91 15.27 18.53 9.05 11.46
Window 175 27.8 5.65 8.01 32.06 33.18 9.17 10.29
Lamp 248 33.7 2.32 2.76 19.26 22.55 8.00 13.50

Note: Types I-V are composites across all lighting conditions (Ring Light, Window, Lamp).

By Sex

Sex N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Male 7233 85.3 3.42 5.34 11.51 15.27 5.70 8.36
Female 6687 74.5 3.38 4.71 14.95 20.05 8.22 12.37

By Age Group

Age Group N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
18-25 4655 81.5 4.28 6.39 11.76 16.48 6.83 10.11
26-35 3817 77.2 3.58 4.84 9.93 14.80 5.87 10.93
36-45 1911 76.7 3.79 5.23 15.18 18.23 6.70 8.24
46-55 2082 90.6 1.69 2.29 18.64 22.29 8.43 11.53
56-65 1308 82.4 2.12 2.96 12.91 17.22 7.09 10.51
65+ 47 16.4 9.23 10.48 37.96 38.52 11.77 12.63

By Lighting Type

Lighting N (samples) Return Rate (%) Mean NN MAE (ms) Mean NN RMSE (ms) RMSSD MAE (ms) RMSSD RMSE (ms) SDNN MAE (ms) SDNN RMSE (ms)
Lamp 4300 77.3 3.36 4.46 12.68 16.90 7.21 11.36
Ring Light 4707 83.7 3.17 4.74 14.41 19.35 7.59 11.48
Window 2771 69.1 4.40 7.12 11.79 17.00 6.07 8.96

9. Fairness & Equity

Bias Assessment Methodology: Performance is stratified by Fitzpatrick skin type (I-VI), sex, camera type, and age group. Per-group metrics and Confidence averages are reported in the Quantitative Analysis tables above.


10. Ethical Considerations

As a remote sensing device, the risks posed to the subjects in the trial are minimal, including the association of each subject with corresponding biometric data. Mitigation of these risks include de-identifying all subject data, including videos, prior to saving it. Additionally, all data is securely stored with access to a select number of trained researchers.

The model is not intended for human life-critical decisions, diagnostics or prognostication.

11. Limitations and Tradeoffs