Presage HRV Model Card


Model Details


Intended Use


Factors

The HRV model first requires Mediapipe’s face detection algorithm to identify the face and 468 key feature points on the face (mesh model). Thus, if these features are not identifiable by Mediapipe’s algorithm, then HRV will not be calculable. Reference the Mediapipe model cards can be found here: Full Range Face detection model card.


These factors can affect model performance:


Other factors:



Metrics

  1. RMSD of point estimates of HRV: root mean square deviation between all HRV values measured within a 60 second period and ground truth measurements evaluated over the same window, measured milliseconds.
  2. MAE of point estimate and 95% CI of HRV: median absolute error or deviation of all measures of HRV as compared to ground truth, measured milliseconds.
  3. Mean proportion of returned values of HRV: for every 60 seconds of video, a single weighted measurement can be measured. Of all possible sets of 60 second clips within a video, this is a measure of the proportion of them that returned a valid measurement of HRV.

Evaluation Data

The evaluation data consists of a set of 231 videos. Corresponding quantities of HRV were measured from a Biopac 3 lead ECG. A clip of 60s from each video was run through the Presage HRV model for evaluation, leading to a total number of 356 samples. Videos were acquired on users covering a range of demographic variability, including age, gender and Fitzpatrick scale.


Quantitative Data

  1. RMSD of point estimate of HRV: 49.78 ms
  2. MAE of point estimate and 95% CI of HRV: 32.51 ms with 95% CI of [28.12, 36.90]
  3. Mean proportion of returned values of HRV and 95% CI: 0.82

Distribution of error figures:


Skin Tone (Fitzpatrick) % of Dataset (num samples) RMSD MAE [95% CI] Mean Return Rate
1 0.17 (73) 36.94 24.20 [16.68, 31.71] 0.79
2 0.14 (60) 36.87 23.31 [13.87, 32.75] 0.75
3 0.09 (38) 22.20 14.81 [9.19, 20.43] 0.79
4 0.15 (65) 56.95 41.49 [28.17, 54.82] 0.62
5 0.14 (60) 90.83 65.31 [42.70, 87.92] 0.55
6 0.15 (66) 53.76 38.91 [26.17, 51.65] 0.48


Sex % of Dataset (num samples) RMSD MAE [95% CI] Mean Return Rate
M 0.36 (161) 37.96 25.80 [20.33, 31.26] 0.71
F 0.45 (201) 62.56 40.45 [32.06, 48.84] 0.62


Camera Type % of Dataset (num samples) RMSD MAE [95% CI] Mean Return Rate
Android 0.48 (212) 40.04 24.64 [19.38, 29.89] 0.74
Econ 0.52 (230) 59.00 41.55 [34.56, 48.53] 0.59











Ethical Considerations

As a remote sensing device, the risks posed to the subjects in the trial are minimal, including the association of each subject with corresponding biometric data. Mitigation of these risks include de-identifying all subject data, including videos, prior to saving it. Additionally, all data is securely stored in a HIPPA compliant database with access to a select number of trained researchers.

The model is not intended for human life-critical decisions, diagnostics or prognostication.

Limitations and Tradeoffs